Wikiquote:Votes for deletion/Armin Rosencranz
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: Kept. There is no consensus to delete at this point in time. ~ UDScott (talk) 19:32, 5 June 2020 (UTC).[reply]
A lawyer and a blogger. No evidence of notability as reliable media don't cover this subject. — Pratap Pandit (talk) 12:52, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Vote closes: 13:00, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
- Keep: Rosencranz is an award winning academic, who is cited hundred of times by academic sources, now that you can't delete my quotes by those bogus copyright claims you are tring to gaming the system with mass deletion requests. And you keep hounding me despite that I told you shold stop. Rupert Loup 13:23, 24 May 2020 (UTC)"
- Rupert Loup is the creator of this page. "Teacher of the year award of a college" is not a notable award. Passing mentions and one liners dont count as significant coverage. The subject lacks significant coverage in Independent reliable media. See Ad Hominem, this article was suggested in an earlier VfD. And I found that it is not notable. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see the article mentioned in that VfD, what I see is that you are also hounding other editors besides me. Rupert Loup 14:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Oops wrong link. This spam was suggested here. Again, please read Ad Hominem --Pratap Pandit (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- So is დამოკიდებულება who is hounding me here. I ask you both that don't involve me in your personal disputes. @UDScott: I think that admins should intervene here. Rupert Loup 14:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no personal dispute. The community can easily judge a spam vs a notable person.--Pratap Pandit (talk) 14:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- So is დამოკიდებულება who is hounding me here. I ask you both that don't involve me in your personal disputes. @UDScott: I think that admins should intervene here. Rupert Loup 14:51, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Oops wrong link. This spam was suggested here. Again, please read Ad Hominem --Pratap Pandit (talk) 14:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't see the article mentioned in that VfD, what I see is that you are also hounding other editors besides me. Rupert Loup 14:30, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
- Rupert Loup is the creator of this page. "Teacher of the year award of a college" is not a notable award. Passing mentions and one liners dont count as significant coverage. The subject lacks significant coverage in Independent reliable media. See Ad Hominem, this article was suggested in an earlier VfD. And I found that it is not notable. --Pratap Pandit (talk) 13:57, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- He was awarded by the Stanford University, the Fulbright Program, and by Phi Beta Kappa which is offen described as the most prestigious honor society in the United States. Seems like this is another case of 'I just don't like it'. Rupert Loup 15:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Rupert, can you read? I never said it was spam, these were Pratap's words.
This is what I said: There are many wikiquote articles that don't have wikipedia articles , but are notable such as: [Examples of notable articles with no corresponding wikipedia articles]as examples among recently created articles that are notable.
I was only giving examples of notable articles with no corresponding wikipedia articles that I was aware of. Like you, I don't believe that a corresponding wikipedia article proves anything about notability.
Pratap was deleting articles on this basis, so I had to give counter-examples, of which I was aware of at the time. --დამოკიდებულება (talk) 19:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.